<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betterimage.org/twitter-facebook-linkedin-and-seo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betterimage.org/twitter-facebook-linkedin-and-seo</link>
	<description>Web Design Raleigh NC, SEO Raleigh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Famals</title>
		<link>http://www.betterimage.org/twitter-facebook-linkedin-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-4076</link>
		<dc:creator>Famals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterimage.org/?p=1595#comment-4076</guid>
		<description>Thank you for good article.
Yeah…I totally agree with this article. Actually the social network has a good and bad point in term of SEO. If we use it in a wrong way, then google might see it as spam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for good article.<br />
Yeah…I totally agree with this article. Actually the social network has a good and bad point in term of SEO. If we use it in a wrong way, then google might see it as spam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://www.betterimage.org/twitter-facebook-linkedin-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 23:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterimage.org/?p=1595#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>OK, but I&#039;m still wondering what kind of a role content itself plays in search marketing. What should a new business person be doing to outline their editorial? How should they approach that part of thinking about creating content? 

DK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, but I&#8217;m still wondering what kind of a role content itself plays in search marketing. What should a new business person be doing to outline their editorial? How should they approach that part of thinking about creating content? </p>
<p>DK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO vs Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.betterimage.org/twitter-facebook-linkedin-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-2163</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO vs Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterimage.org/?p=1595#comment-2163</guid>
		<description>I agree, however one cannot deny social media for its SEO benefits, but it should be used correctly.

For the most part, social media is a great way to create an online presence. Whether Google sees nofollow links as untrusted, or not, it will see users linking to you.

Apart from SEO, in the long run, it might also lead some of those precious conversions, whether it is a contact form being filled out, or a shopping basket being checked out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, however one cannot deny social media for its SEO benefits, but it should be used correctly.</p>
<p>For the most part, social media is a great way to create an online presence. Whether Google sees nofollow links as untrusted, or not, it will see users linking to you.</p>
<p>Apart from SEO, in the long run, it might also lead some of those precious conversions, whether it is a contact form being filled out, or a shopping basket being checked out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorkshire Web Design</title>
		<link>http://www.betterimage.org/twitter-facebook-linkedin-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorkshire Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterimage.org/?p=1595#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Good article, wasn&#039;t aware of this. Thanks Ted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, wasn&#8217;t aware of this. Thanks Ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goalranks</title>
		<link>http://www.betterimage.org/twitter-facebook-linkedin-and-seo/comment-page-1#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Goalranks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 02:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterimage.org/?p=1595#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Yeah...I totally agree with this article. Actually the social network has a good and bad point in term of SEO. If we use it in a wrong way, then google might see it as spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;I totally agree with this article. Actually the social network has a good and bad point in term of SEO. If we use it in a wrong way, then google might see it as spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

